Qwen3.8 27B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash scores higher on 3 of the 3 benchmarks both models publish. The widest gap is on Terminal-Bench, where DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads by 17.6 points. Both have open weights; Qwen3.8 27B is far lighter to host, needing about 19 GB at 4-bit against 381 GB for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash.
Shared benchmarks
Raw published scores; the higher score on each row is highlighted. LMArena Elo is a human-preference vote and is not counted as a win.
- GPQA Diamond89.290.9
Pass@1, max reasoning effort
- Humanity's Last Exam30.836.8
Pass@1, no tools, max effort (text-only subset: 39.1)
- Terminal-Bench73.090.6
Terminal Bench 2.1 (Terminus harness)Terminal-Bench 2.1, Pass@1, max effort
- LMArena Text Elo · not counted14361476
LMArena text overall, 'Qwen3.8-27B', ±5, as of 2026-10-27LMArena text overall, 'DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-20260910 (Max)', ±6, as of 2026-10-27
Should you pick Qwen3.8 27B or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?
Pick Qwen3.8 27B if…
- You want the lighter model to host: about 19 GB at 4-bit against 381 GB.
- You want to run it locally: at 4-bit it fits one 24–32 GB consumer GPU.
- You want it running in minutes on a dedicated GPU through OpenLLM Buddy, in an uncensored build.
Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash if…
- You care most about Humanity's Last Exam, Terminal-Bench, where it scores at least 2 points higher.
- People prefer its answers in blind chats: LMArena Elo 1476 against 1436.
- You need fast responses: about 217 tokens per second through APIs, against 41.
- Cost matters: $1.20 per million output tokens against $2.55.
- You want it running in minutes on a dedicated GPU through OpenLLM Buddy, in an uncensored build.
Hardware and cost to run
Qwen3.8 27B
At 4-bit it needs about 19 GB, which fits a single RTX 4090, so it can run on a home workstation with llama.cpp, Ollama, or vLLM. Full BF16 precision needs about 62 GB (1× H100 (80 GB)).
On OpenLLM Buddy: Qwen3.8-27B-Uncensored-FP8 runs on H100 80GB as an FP8 build, with an OpenAI-compatible API and no per-token fees. Prices start at $53 USD for 11 hours.
Deploy Qwen3.8 27BDeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Even at 4-bit it needs about 381 GB (4× H200 (564 GB)), well beyond a home workstation, so most people run it on rented multi-GPU servers. Full BF16 precision needs about 1.3 TB (Multiple nodes (over 1.1 TB)).
On OpenLLM Buddy: DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-UNCENSORED-FP8 runs on 4× H200 141GB as an FP8 build, with an OpenAI-compatible API and no per-token fees. Prices start at $280 USD for 11 hours.
Deploy DeepSeek V4.1 FlashCategory profile
Category index uses every test each model reports, not only the shared ones.
Specs side by side
| Qwen3.8 27B | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Lab | Alibaba Qwen | DeepSeek |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Released | 2026-08-14 | 2026-09-10 |
| Parameters | 27B dense | 552B total, 16B active (MoE) |
| Context | 262K (up to 1M) | 1M |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| 4-bit memory | 19 GB · RTX 4090 (24 GB) | 381 GB · 4× H200 (564 GB) |
| API price | $0.425 in / $2.55 out per 1M tokens | $0.300 in / $1.20 out per 1M tokens |
| API speed | 41 tok/s | 217 tok/s |
| One-GPU speed (est.) | ≈ 52–69 tok/s on H100 80GB (FP8) | — |
Related comparisons
Qwen3.8 27B vs Gemma 4 31B
Qwen3.8 27B vs Qwen3.6 27B
Qwen3.8 27B vs Gemma 4 26B A4B
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GPT-6 Astra
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemini 3.8 Flash
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiMo V2.6 Pro
GLM 5.3 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Gemma 4 31B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Sources
| Model | Test | Score | Setting | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.8 27B | GPQA Diamond | 89.2 | — | Qwen3.8-27B model card (Hugging Face) |
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | GPQA Diamond | 90.9 | Pass@1, max reasoning effort | DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash model card (Hugging Face) |
| Qwen3.8 27B | Humanity's Last Exam | 30.8 | — | Qwen3.8-27B model card (Hugging Face) |
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Humanity's Last Exam | 36.8 | Pass@1, no tools, max effort (text-only subset: 39.1) | DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash model card (Hugging Face) |
| Qwen3.8 27B | Terminal-Bench | 73.0 | Terminal Bench 2.1 (Terminus harness) | Qwen3.8-27B model card (Hugging Face) |
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Terminal-Bench | 90.6 | Terminal-Bench 2.1, Pass@1, max effort | DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash model card (Hugging Face) |
| Qwen3.8 27B | LMArena Text Elo | 1436 | LMArena text overall, 'Qwen3.8-27B', ±5, as of 2026-10-27 | Arena (LMArena) text leaderboard |
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | LMArena Text Elo | 1476 | LMArena text overall, 'DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-20260910 (Max)', ±6, as of 2026-10-27 | Arena (LMArena) text leaderboard |
Scores are published results from model cards, lab reports, and public leaderboards, each linked to its source. Settings such as thinking mode or test version differ between sources and are shown next to each score. OpenLLM Buddy catalog models are uncensored fine-tunes; their scores are those of the official base model. Data collected 2026-10-30. How the index works